Politicians Want to Protect us From the Evils of On-Line Gambling Part 3

This is allotment 3 of a multipart alternation of online writing apropos proposed anti-gambling legislation. In this article, I abide the altercation of the affidavit claimed to accomplish this legislation necessary, and the facts that abide in the absolute world, including the Jack Abramoff affiliation and the addictive attributes of online gambling.

The legislators are aggravating to assure us from something, or are they? The accomplished affair seems a little ambagious to say the least.

As mentioned in antecedent articles, the House, and the Senate, are already afresh because the affair of “Online Gambling”. Bills acquire been submitted by Congressmen Goodlatte and Leach, and aswell by Senator Kyl.

The bill getting put advanced by Rep. Goodlatte, The Internet Bank Prohibition Act, has the declared ambition of afterlight the Wire Act to outlaw all forms of online gambling, to accomplish it actionable for a bank business to acquire acclaim and cyberbanking transfers, and to force ISPs and Common Carriers to block admission to bank accompanying sites at the appeal of law enforcement.

Just as does Rep. Goodlatte, Sen. Kyl, in his bill, Prohibition on Funding of Unlawful Internet Gambling, makes it actionable for bank businesses to acquire acclaim cards, cyberbanking transfers, checks and added forms of transaction for the purpose on agreement actionable bets, but his bill does not abode those that abode bets.

The bill submitted by Rep. Leach, The Unlawful Internet Bank Administration Act, is basically a archetype of the bill submitted by Sen. Kyl. It focuses on preventing bank businesses from accepting acclaim cards, cyberbanking transfers, checks, and added payments, and like the Kyl bill makes no changes to what is currently legal, or illegal.

In a adduce from Goodlatte we acquire “Jack Abramoff’s absolute apathy for the aldermanic action has accustomed Internet bank to abide advancing into what is now a twelve billion-dollar business which not alone hurts individuals and their families but makes the abridgement ache by clarification billions of dollars from the United States and serves as a car for money laundering.”

There are several absorbing credibility here.

First of all, we acquire a little misdirection about Jack Abramoff and his apathy for the aldermanic process. This comment, and others that acquire been made, chase the argumentation that; 1) Jack Abramoff was adjoin to these bills, 2) Jack Abramoff was corrupt, 3) to abstain getting associated with bribery you should vote for these bills. This is of advance absurd. If we followed this argumentation to the extreme, we should go aback and abandoned any bills that Abramoff supported, and achieve any bills that he opposed, behindhand of the agreeable of the bill. Legislation should be passed, or not, based on the affirmation of the proposed legislation, not based on the acceptability of one individual.

As well, if Jack Abramoff adjoin antecedent bills, he did so on account of his applicant eLottery, attempting to get the auction of action tickets over the internet afar from the legislation. Ironically, the protections he was gluttonous are included in this new bill, back accompaniment run lotteries would be excluded. Jack Abramoff accordingly would apparently abutment this legislation back it gives him what he was searching for. That does not stop Goodlatte and others from application Abramoff’s contempo abasement as a agency to accomplish their bill attending better, appropriately authoritative it not just an anti-gambling bill, but somehow an ant-corruption bill as well, while at the aforementioned time advantageous Abramoff and his client.

Next, is his account that online bank “hurts individuals and their families”. I assume that what he is apropos to actuality is botheration gambling. Let’s set the almanac straight. Alone a baby allotment of gamblers become botheration gamblers, not a baby allotment of the population, but alone a baby allotment of gamblers.

In addition, Goodlatte would acquire you accept that Internet bank is added addictive than bank gambling. Sen. Kyl has gone so far as to alarm online bank “the able cocaine of gambling”, advertence the adduce to some un-named researcher. To the contrary, advisers acquire apparent that bank on the Internet is no added addictive than bank in a casino. As a amount of fact, cyberbanking bank machines, begin in casinos and chase advance all over the country are added addictive than online gambling.

In analysis by N. Dowling, D. Smith and T. Thomas at the School of Health Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Australia “There is a accepted appearance that cyberbanking gaming is the a lot of ‘addictive’ anatomy of gambling, in that it contributes added to causing botheration bank than any added bank activity. As such, cyberbanking gaming machines acquire been referred to as the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling”.

As to Sen. Kyls affirmation about “crack cocaine”, quotes at http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/20733/ cover “Cultural busybodies acquire continued accepted that in column this-is-your-brain-on-drugs America, the best way to win absorption for a pet could cause is to analyze it to some affliction that already scares the bejesus out of America”. And “During the 1980s and ’90s, it was a little different. Then, a adverse new trend wasn’t clearly on the accessible alarm until anyone dubbed it “the new able cocaine.” And “On his Vice Squad weblog, University of Chicago Professor Jim Leitzel addendum that a Google seek finds experts declaring aperture machines (The New York Times Magazine), video slots (the Canadian Press) and casinos (Madison Capital Times) the “crack cocaine of gambling,” respectively. Leitzel’s seek aswell begin that spam email is “the able cocaine of advertising” (Sarasota, Fla. Herald Tribune), and that cybersex is a affectionate of animal “spirtual able cocaine” (Focus on the Family)”.

As we can see, calling something the “crack cocaine” has become a absurd metaphor, assuming alone that the being authoritative the account feels it is important. But again we knew that Rep. Goodlatte, Rep. Leach and Sen. Kyl acquainted that the affair was important or they wouldn’t acquire brought the proposed legislation forward.

In the next article, I will abide advantage of the issues aloft by politicians who are adjoin online gambling, and accommodate a altered angle to their rhetoric, accoutrement the “drain on the economy” acquired by online gambling, and the angle of money laundering.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.